Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

Journal Simantec maintains the highest standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process. key characteristics of which are listed below:

• Each manuscript submitted by the author will do peer review
• Each article will be reviewed by reviewers.
• Any incoming paper will be checked by the editor, if it does not match the scope of the Journal Simantec, it will be returned for rejection, so if there are things that do not match the regularized style, then the paper will be returned to the author if it is appropriate With a regularized style Journal Simantec, it will be assigned to reviewers.
• Generally, the candidate of reviewers will be chosen based on their reputation in the international publication number and quality. Next step, The Editor sends the invitation letter for each candidate of the reviewer. After the candidate of the reviewer informed their availabilities for the reviewing process, the Editor creates an account for each reviewer and then send the manuscript by OJS.
• All publication decisions are made by the journals’ Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the reviews provided.
• Members of the Editorial Boards lend insight, advice, and guidance to the Editors-in-Chief generally and to assist decision making on specific submissions.
• Editorial Assistants provide the administrative support that allows maintaining the integrity of peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers, and editors alike.
• All reviewing process are in double-blind peer review and managed by the editor in the OJS.